Posts Tagged ‘fraud’

MonJan30

Jury: Hamilton Township police conspired to raid party

Posted by rrichardson January 30th, 2012, 11:38 am Post a Comment
Hamilton Twp. Police Lt. Det. Jeff Braley

Jeff Braley, then the lead detective for Hamilton Township Police, testifies in the second murder trial of Ryan Widmer, of Mason. File photo

Janice Morse reports:

A federal court case ended on two parallel tracks Friday, in favor of a Warren County couple and two young men who sued police and won.

An eight-member jury unanimously agreed that Hamilton Township police conspired to violate the plaintiffs’ rights and raided a party illegally in 2007 – and word of that decision reached lawyers just moments after they had hammered out a settlement of monetary damages, said attorney Konrad Kircher.

He and attorney Michael Arnold represented the plaintiffs who sued the police, Ted and Mary Pritchard and their party guests, Zachary Christman and Kevin Clark.

The jury’s verdict still prevails on the facts of the case, Kircher said, because that was what both sides agreed upon. However, he said, the plaintiffs will receive the settlement amount of $350,000, not the amounts the jury set: $29,114 for each of the Pritchards, $4,325 for Christman and $8,007 for Clark, plus attorneys’ fees.

Kircher said that, as time passed, both sides worried the jury might be hung, without the required unanimous verdict, and neither side wanted to face another trial after nearly five years of court battles.

Even though the jury-set amounts were more modest, Kircher said the fact that the jury decided to impose punitive damages was significant. “You just rarely see that happen,” Kircher said, noting that, in his 20-year law career he has never had a jury grant a punitive award against a government official. “The jury had to find that they acted in bad faith, with ill will, actual malice – and most government officials are able to establish that they were just negligent, that they made a mistake. That wasn’t what we had in this case.”

Wilson Weisenfelder, a lawyer who represented the police, said he was disappointed in the verdict and still maintained his clients did nothing wrong.

At least 40 times, Judge Susan J. Dlott read the word, “yes,” repeating the jury’s findings that the defendants had violated the plaintiffs’ rights. The defendants were Police Chief Frank Richardson, now deceased; two lieutenants, Phil Johnson and Jeff Braley; plus Officer Roger Gilbert and his wife, Gail, a civilian.

Mary Pritchard wept. She later said it was because she felt the verdict vindicated her and her husband and, “it lifts a burden off my shoulders.”

The raid happened Aug. 10, 2007, after Braley, acting on an unverified tip that the Pritchards were throwing an underage drinking bash, lined up state liquor agents and other personnel to raid the party. He drove past the Pritchards’ property a half-dozen times and saw no laws being broken. Then, Braley and Johnson conferred. Next, Johnson asked Gilbert to have his wife call the dispatch center to report she was hearing a loud party at the Pritchards’ even though she was miles away at her home in another county.

After that call, nearly two dozen officers swarmed the property; Christman and Clark were arrested. Christman was then 18 and was charged with underage consumption even though he was drinking under his father’s supervision on private property, which is allowed under Ohio law. Clark, then 21, was arrested for disorderly conduct after he used his cell phone to check a text message after an officer ordered him to stop using his phone to videotape the raid. Their charges were dropped.

Later, two anonymous letters, possibly from other police officers, arrived, alerting the Pritchards to Mrs. Gilbert’s bogus phone call and other details. To the letter-writers, Mrs. Pritchard says: “Thank God…thanks for your honesty.”

Braley was then a detective lieutenant. He resigned last year after controversy over his employment credentials surfaced in an offshoot from the Ryan Widmer murder case. Braley was the lead detective in that case, which ended with Widmer, who last lived in Mason, being convicted of murder in the 2008 bathtub drowning of his newlywed wife, Sarah, 24. Widmer is now serving 15 years to life in prison.

Kircher says he has no idea whether Widmer is guilty or not, but “I would question any investigation Jeff Braley ever did.”

no comments yet

Posted in: News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

FriJan27

No verdict yet in party raid case against Widmer detective

Posted by rrichardson January 27th, 2012, 5:29 pm Post a Comment
Hamilton Twp. Police Lt. Det. Jeff Braley

Former Hamilton Twp. Lt. Det. Jeff Braley testifies in the murder trial of Ryan Widmer, who last lived in Mason. Braley, who resigned from the department, is now embroiled in a non-related civil suit. File photo

Update
The jury has found police in Hamilton Township illegally conspired to raid a party and violated residents’ rights.

MasonBuzz will update this story.

Janice Morse reports:

A federal court jury has told a judge it will continue working into the evening, after 10 hours of deliberations.

The jury, which is considering whether police in Hamilton Township illegally raided a party and violated residents’ rights, began with two hours of deliberations Thursday.

At last check late this afternoon, jurors had deliberated another eight hours without reaching a verdict.

Residents Mary and Ted Pritchard sued Hamilton Township officers, alleging that officers raided an adult birthday party on their property in 2007 under false pretenses, assuming the Pritchards were throwing an underage drinking bash.

After a half-dozen checks on the property revealed no violations, a police lieutenant asked one of his subordinates to have his wife make a phone call from her home in another county and report that she heard loud noise coming from the block where the Pritchards live. After that call, nearly two dozen officers eventually swarmed the property.

The Pritchards later learned about the call from an anonymous letter, possibly from an honest police officer troubled by that call, their lawyer said.

Police deny any wrongdoing; their lawyer says they were just trying to do their jobs and there was no conspiracy to raid the property.

Two of the Pritchards’ partygoers also sued the police, alleging false arrest. Their charges were eventually dismissed but both had to hire lawyers.

Zachary Christman was then 18 and was charged with underage consumption even though he was drinking under his father’s supervision on private property, which is allowed under Ohio law.

Kevin Clark, then 21, was arrested for disorderly conduct after he used his cell phone to check a text message after an officer ordered him to stop using his phone to videotape the raid.

The plaintiffs have not specified an amount of monetary damages they are seeking.

The defendants in the case include the estate of the now-deceased Hamilton Township police chief, Frank Richardson, as well as a current officer, Lt. Phil Johnson and former officers Roger Gilbert and Jeff Braley.

Braley was then a detective lieutenant but resigned last year after controversy over his employment credentials surfaced in an offshoot from the Ryan Widmer murder case. Braley was the lead detective in that case, which ended with Widmer being convicted of murder in the 2008 bathtub drowning of his newlywed wife, Sarah, 24.

Widmer, who last lived in Mason, is now serving 15 years to life in prison.

Several of Widmer’s suppporters came to court to listen to Braley’s testimony and observe the trial, which began Monday.

no comments yet

Posted in: News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

ThuJan26

Civil suit against Widmer detective goes to the jury

Posted by rrichardson January 26th, 2012, 2:28 pm Post a Comment
Hamilton Twp. Police Lt. Det. Jeff Braley

Former Hamilton Twp. Lt. Det. Jeff Braley testifies in the murder trial of Ryan Widmer, who last lived in Mason and was convicted in his third trial. Braley, who resigned from the department, is now embroiled in a non-related civil suit. File photo

Janice Morse reports:

A federal court jury is about to begin deliberating in the case of Warren County residents who accuse police of unlawfully raiding an adult birthday party, falsely arresting two partygoers and maliciously prosecuting them.

As of 1:30 p.m., Judge Susan J. Dlott was still providing jurors with detailed instructions as to how to decide the case under both state and federal laws. The trial began Monday in U.S. District Court, Cincinnati, over a party that happened four and a half years ago.

In their civil lawsuit, Hamilton Township residents Ted and Mary Pritchard and two young men who attended their 2007 party — Kevin Clark and Zach Christman — allege police conspired to raid the Pritchards’ party under false pretenses, then tried to cover-up their alleged wrongdoing. Judge Dlott has already ruled that Christman’s right against false arrest was violated under federal law, but the jury must decide whether his right against false arrest was violated under state law.

Wilson Weisenfelder, a lawyer defending Hamilton Township police, asked the jury to grant little or no monetary damages for Christman. Weisenfelder also argued that there was no evidence of a conspiracy or cover-up. He again repeated what he had told the jury in opening statements — that the case was about police trying to do their jobs.

Konrad Kircher, who represents the Pritchards, Clark and Christman, said that, for jurors to believe that, they would have to “ignore a mountain of contrary evidence.”

He said the Pritchards have a constitutional right to be free from unlawful intrusion of police on their premises — and that police concocted a scenario to try to justify going onto the Pritchards’ property. That included a bogus telephone report of loud noise coming from the property, which is located on an acre of land largely isolated from other homes, Kircher said.

A Hamilton Township officer’s wife, Gail Gilbert, who was then living in Butler County, miles away from the party location, called a dispatcher in Warren County and reported: “I hear a lot of yelling and screaming from the 10,000 block of Schlotmann (Road)…I’d rather remain anonymous…it sounds like a big-ol’ party or somethin’ goin’ on.”

Kircher told the jury that Mrs. Gilbert made the call after her husband’s supervisor, Lt. Phil Johnson, asked Officer Roger Gilbert to request the call be made. Kircher played a recording of call for the jury to hear and said, “I want you to ask yourselves: Is this a reluctant wallflower who doesn’t want to cooperate?” Kircher suggested Mrs. Gilbert was an enthusiastic participant in the alleged conspiracy, which could have helped advance her husband’s career if everything had gone as planned.

(more…)

no comments yet

Posted in: News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

TueJan24

Widmer detective denies conspiracy in birthday raid

Posted by rrichardson January 24th, 2012, 8:42 am Post a Comment
Jeff Braley

Jeff Braley, then the lead detective for Hamilton Township Police, testifies in the second murder trial of Ryan Widmer, of Mason. File photo

Janice Morse reports:

The former detective from the Ryan Widmer murder case testified for about a half hour Monday in an unrelated federal court civil-rights trial, denying allegations that he and other officers “conspired” to raid an adult birthday party under false pretenses.

“I didn’t put together anything, sir…I did not plan anything,” Jeff Braley, a former police lieutenant, said in response to a question from Konrad Kircher, a lawyer representing Ted and Mary Pritchard of Hamilton Township and two other people.

Kircher questioned Braley about events surrounding the 2007 incident on the Pritchards’ property.

Kircher did not ask Braley about his employment credentials as part of his testimony today, although Kircher was allowed to explore that topic in a pretrial deposition.

Braley has denied making false statements found in his employment records. He resigned last year after an investigation into those documents.

In the Pritchard case, the family and their partygoers allege that nearly two dozen officers stormed the property in 2007 based on unsupported suspicions of underage drinking, court records say. The party was being thrown for Ted Pritchard’s 52nd birthday and for the Pritchards’ son’s 21st birthday, Kircher said.

The Pritchard family later learned that the raid happened partly because a Hamilton Township officer’s wife called the Hamilton Township police department from her Butler County home, pretending to be calling from Warren County and reporting she heard loud noise coming from the Prtichards’ party, court records say.

Prospective jurors in the Pritchard case denied recognizing Braley from the highly publicized Widmer case, which ended with Widmer, now 31, who last lived in Mason, being convicted in the 2008 bathtub drowning of his wife. His case went to trial three times before he was convicted a year ago. Only two of the prospective jurors in the Pritchard case said they followed any phase of the Widmer case closely.

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

MonJan23

Widmer detective faces questions again

Posted by rrichardson January 23rd, 2012, 12:49 pm Post a Comment

Jeff Braley

Janice Morse reports:

Did authorities — including the lead detective on the Ryan Widmer murder case — illegally raid an adult birthday party and falsely arrest partygoers?

That’s among the main questions that a jury will be asked to decide in a federal civil-rights lawsuit trial that begins today in U.S. District Court, Cincinnati.

Jury selection began this morning in the case involving a family in Warren County’s Hamilton Township.

As part of the trial, former Widmer murder case detective Jeff Braley once again will face being grilled about his alleged resume fraud, court records indicate.

Braley and other officers are accused of conspiring to raid an adult birthday party under false pretenses, then falsely arresting partygoers, whose charges were later dropped. The Pritchard family and their partygoers allege that nearly two dozen officers and state liquor agents stormed the property in 2007 based on unsupported suspicions of underage drinking, court records say. The party was being thrown for Ted Pritchard’s 51st birthday, court records say.

The Pritchard family later learned that the raid happened partly because a Hamilton Township officer’s wife called the Hamilton Township police department from her Butler County home, pretending to be calling from Warren County and reporting she heard loud noise coming from the Prtichards’ party, court records say.

Prospective jurors in the Pritchard case denied recognizing Braley from the highly publicized Widmer case, which ended with Widmer, now 31, who last lived in Mason, being convicted in the 2008 bathtub drowning of his wife. His case went to trial three times, but only two of the prospective jurors in the Pritchard case said they followed any phase of the case closely.

Braley resigned last year after an investigation into false statements on some of his employment documents, though he denied ever making the misrepresentations. Lawyers for Widmer, who is serving 15 years to life in prison for murder, say that Braley’s credibility issues raise questions about the integrity of the Widmer investigation.

A Warren County judge rejected that argument earlier this month. Widmer’s lawyers say they will appeal.

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

FriJan13

Don’t send donations to this fraudulent group

Posted by rrichardson January 13th, 2012, 8:30 am Post a Comment

Janice Morse reports:

If you’ve received a letter seeking contributions to “The United States Deputy Sheriff’s Association,” be forewarned: The group no longer exists, authorities say.

Someone is fraudulently using the name of that now-defunct police group to solicit donations, the Warren County Sheriff’s Office says.

In a news release alerting the public to the scam, Sheriff Larry Sims said people are receiving letters purporting to come from that group, which was once-legitimate but no longer exists.

“The letter requests donations to support under funded Sheriff’s Offices throughout the country,” the news release said.

The address listed on the letters is a UPS mail drop box in Virginia, Sims said, and authorities in that state have launched a criminal investigation.

None of the letters had been reported received in Warren County but sheriffs in other Ohio counties have learned about citizens receiving such letters, Sims said.

Sims requests anyone who has received such a letter to contact his office at 513-695-1280.

“It is a shame these scam artists prey upon the well-meaning citizens who support law enforcement,” Sims said. “As with any charitable solicitation, I urge the public to investigate the charity before giving.”

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , ,

MonDec12

Widmer lawyers: Bathtub seized improperly

Posted by rrichardson December 12th, 2011, 5:45 pm Post a Comment

Janice Morse reports:

Was Ryan Widmer’s murder conviction “a manifest miscarriage of justice?”

In an appeal filed Monday lawyers for Widmer allege that a jury lost its way and that authorities made crucial mistakes, including improperly seizing the bathtub in which his wife, Sarah, 24, had drowned in 2008.

Widmer, 30, of Mason, is serving 15 years to life in prison after a jury convicted him of murder in February.

Since then, Widmer has given two public interviews protesting his innocence and saying he wanted to testify but he did not take the witness stand during any of his three trials based on his lawyers’ advice.

Today was the deadline for attorney Michele Berry to file the appeal on Widmer’s behalf in the Ohio 12th District Court of Appeals in Middletown.

That court previously refused to extend a deadline while Judge Neal Bronson considers motions for a fourth trial in Warren County Common Pleas Court.

In those motions, Widmer’s lawyers want Bronson to order genetic testing that could show whether Sarah Widmer suffered from a disorder that can disrupt heartbeats. Berry argues Widmer’s previous lawyers made a mistake by failing to seek that testing.

They also argue Bronson should grant a new trial because evidence emerged after Widmer’s conviction showing that the lead investigators on the case, Lt. Jeff Braley, had likely made false representations about his job history and education on employment documents.

Bronson had refused to allow Widmer’s lawyers to grill Braley on those credibility issues largely because Braley had denied making the false claims. Braley resigned from the Hamilton Township police force in June after an indpendent investigator told trustees there was reason to consider launching a pre-disciplinary hearing over issues with his honesty.

Widmer’s lawyers say that the genetic testing and Braley evidence likely would have altered the entire course of Widmer’s trial, had they been included.

Related stories:

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

ThuNov17

Court rejects more time for Widmer appeal

Posted by rrichardson November 17th, 2011, 6:20 pm Post a Comment

Paul McKibben reports:

The Ohio 12th District Court of Appeals will not grant Ryan Widmer’s defense team more time to appeal his February murder conviction.

“The 12th District (and any appellate court for that matter) rarely – almost never – grants stays in these circumstances but it made sense to try for the stay here because our case before Bronson is so strong,” said attorney Michele Berry, who is handling the appeal.

Berry said the court did not speak to the strength of their case and called the ruling a procedural matter.

In a separate issue, Warren County Common Pleas Judge Neal Bronson hasn’t ruled yet on whether Widmer should be granted a fourth trial.

Earlier this year, Berry said she needed more time to file the appeal because she had not received a complete transcript of Widmer’s third trial and pre-trial hearings. She said the partial third trial transcript already was more than 3,000 pages with another 1,000 or more pages likely. Berry also said she was reviewing thousands of other pages of transcripts from Widmer’s two previous trials.

A Warren County jury convicted Widmer in February for the 2008 bathtub drowning death of his wife Sarah in their Hamilton Township home.

Widmer, 31, who last lived in Mason, is serving 15 years to life in prison. The Colerain Township native has maintained his innocence. He was convicted in his first trial in 2009 but the verdict was set aside because of jury misconduct. His 2010 trial resulted in a hung jury.

Berry said a brief for the appeal is due to the appeals court on Dec. 12.

Related stories:

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

MonOct17

Widmer’s chance of new trial ‘fair’ at best, say legal experts

Posted by rrichardson October 17th, 2011, 9:08 am Post a Comment

Legal experts who’ve followed the Ryan Widmer case say the chances of the convicted Mason man getting a fourth trial are “fair” at best.

Attorneys for Widmer, who was convicted in February in the 2008 drowning death of his wife, Sarah, filed a motion Wednesday asking a Warren County judge to set aside Widmer’s February murder conviction and accusing officials of perjury and cover-up.

The Enquirer’s Janice Morse spoke with several legal experts who’ve been following the case about the latest court documents filed.

“I think Judge (Neal) Bronson probably has a pretty strong case of ‘Widmer fatigue,’ but even so, he’ll do the right thing,” says defense lawyer Mike Allen, who has closely watched the saga since it began in 2008 with the drowning of Widmer’s wife, Sarah, 24, in their Hamilton Township bathtub.

While Allen, Warren County Prosecutor David Fornshell and other experts think Widmer’s chances of persuading Bronson to grant a fourth trial are small, University of Cincinnati law professor Christo Lassiter says issues swirling around the case are grave.

Concerns about the honesty of Jeff Braley, the lead investigator, and how he may have influenced the county coroner, Russell Uptegrove, “not only provides a reason to doubt the conviction, it reeks of an injustice,” Lassiter said.

Despite that strong statement, Lassiter agrees with other experts that it will be very difficult for Widmer’s lawyer to overcome legal hurdles to prove a new trial is warranted.

Joe Mooney, a Northern Kentucky University law student who coordinated a panel discussion on the Widmer case said, “I think this (motion for a new trial) is a ‘Hail Mary’ pass that will likely fall incomplete. … At the end of the day, I would not bet any money on a fourth trial.”

Bronson’s decision on whether to grant a retrial may well turn on whether he now agrees that a jury should have been allowed to hear Widmer’s lawyers grill Braley over his credentials. Bronson blocked that line of questioning after a closed-door hearing in his chambers in 2010 about alleged resume fraud.

“When he made that decision, Judge Bronson didn’t know everything that we know now about Braley. … And now, if the judge believes Braley committed perjury, that’s one of the keys to the case,” said Mark Krumbein, a defense lawyer who became so fascinated by Widmer’s case he attended portions of all three trials.

Braley resigned in June after an investigator reported that Braley falsely claimed he had served in the U.S. Special Forces, which secured him a position heading the township’s police tactical unit in 2001 – before he became a sworn police officer.

“What happened with Braley was an abomination,” Allen said. “It’s almost unbelievable that a person could misrepresent his credentials like that and be put in such a position of responsibility.”

The investigator also found evidence dating to 1996, supporting allegations that Braley falsely asserted on township documents that he earned a master’s degree and held various jobs; Braley denied making the misrepresentations, but a handwriting analysis supported the allegation that the writing was his, officials said.

Fornshell downplayed the significance of Braley’s issues. But Allen, a former Hamilton County prosecutor, said that if he were in Fornshell’s position, he thinks the situation is “egregious enough” to consider taking the case to a grand jury to consider a possible perjury indictment of Braley.

“The problems with Braley are huge,” Allen said. “But did not knowing about them during the trial affect the outcome? I think a strong argument could be made either way.”

Lassiter thinks that, in order to grant a new trial, Bronson would have to decide that revelations about Braley may well have changed jurors’ minds about Widmer’s guilt, had they been aired during the trial.

Allen notes that Bronson has a reputation for doing what he thinks is just, even if it draws fire. It was Bronson who voided Widmer’s 2009 murder conviction because of jury misconduct; a hung jury resulted in 2010, followed by a conviction this year.

Fornshell dismisses Braley’s issues as irrelevant to the crime that Widmer is convicted of committing. But Krumbein said it’s reasonable to question the entire foundation of the case based on Braley’s involvement in it.

“Judge Bronson may feel that, if he (Braley) lied about substantive things in the past, and lied under oath in a pre-trial hearing, can anything he did or said be trusted?” Krumbein said.

And Braley did play a pivotal role in the case, Krumbein said.

“He maintained the crime scene, supervised gathering all the evidence. Then he told the coroner he thought this was a homicide – and he may not have been any more qualified to say that than the Man in the Moon. His qualifications were pretty bad.

“As the defense has already argued, if you can’t trust the messenger, you may get the wrong message.”

Widmer, 30, who last lived in Mason, was convicted in his third trial on Feb. 15.  His first trial ended in a conviction, but the guilty verdict was set aside because of jury misconduct.  The second trial ended with a hung jury.

Related stories:

What do you think?  Should Ryan Widmer get a fourth trial?  Discuss in the comments below.

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

WedOct12

Will there be a fourth Ryan Widmer murder trial?

Posted by rrichardson October 12th, 2011, 6:21 pm Post a Comment

An attorney for Ryan Widmer has filed a motion requesting a new trial for the Mason man convicted in the 2008 drowning of his wife, Sarah.

Widmer’s lawyer, Michele Berry, filed court documents today asking a Warren County judge to set aside Widmer’s February murder conviction and accusing officials of perjury and cover-up.

Berry also wants the judge to grant a hearing based on the “newly discovered evidence of false statements, lack of competence and training and outright fraud by the lead detective in this case, former Lieutenant Detective Jeff Braley.”

Further, Berry says Widmer’s former lawyers also made a grievous mistake when they failed to get Sarah Widmer’s DNA tested for Long QT Syndrome, a genetic condition that could have contributed to her drowning.

That alone should entitle Widmer to a new trial, Berry said.

Enquirer reporter Janice Morse has more details on the latest development in the case:

But much of the 35-page motion hammers on Braley’s involvement in the case and authorities’ failure to disclose information about Braley’s history of alleged misrepresentations. Braley resigned from his job earlier this year after an outside investigator checked into those allegations.

If the defense lawyers had been aware of the facts that were later released, Widmer’s lawyers could have impeached Braley and mounted a defense “which would have changed the nature of the entire trial,” Berry said.

“Had the defense been aware of these facts, this evidence could have been used not only to impeach Braley … but… to mount a … defense, which would have changed the nature of the entire trial.”

Last month, an expert who has evaluated 500 cases of police misconduct nationwide, Dennis Waller, issued a report about the Widmer case and “opines that, based on national law enforcement standards, Braley could be classified as ‘an opportunist without substance in a police department without established standards,’” Berry wrote.

In the court filing, Berry alleges that Braley committed perjury in a closed-door hearing on May 5, 2010, focusing on allegations that he had misrepresented his qualifications.

Previously, prosecutors have asserted that Braley’s role in Widmer’s trial was minimal, and the evidence was strong enough to obtain a conviction without him.

But in court records, Berry says Waller believes that “Braley’s incompetence, untrustworthiness, and penchant for manufacturing facts to further his career, are all relevant to the fingerprints and other marks on the bathtub, the collection of evidence in general … the decision to charge Widmer, and the conclusion of (Warren County Coroner Russell Uptegrove) that this case was a homicide.”

Uptegrove, in an interview with the Enquirer earlier this year, denied that Braley exerted any undue influence.

Widmer, 30, who last lived in Mason, was convicted in his third trial on Feb. 15.  His first trial ended in a conviction, but the guilty verdict was set aside because of jury misconduct.  The second trial ended with a hung jury.

MasonBuzz will update this story.

Related stories:

What do you think?  Should Ryan Widmer get a fourth trial?  Discuss in the comments below.

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Connect with MasonBuzz

Subscribe

Get community news delivered straight to your inbox.

Featured Businesses

Send us Photos

  • Attach a JPEG (.jpg) photo to your story. Maximum file size is 4 MB.
  • Add a caption, include names & communities of people pictured. (Caption limit: 500 characters, including spaces)

Recent Photos

Aman Kumar Rick Santorum Rick Santorum Jamie Morath Invertigo Taste of Mason Mikki Taylor Hearts for Hope gala Hearts for Hope gala
View more photos >