Posts Tagged ‘hamilton township’

WedSep19

Little Miami to appeal state ruling on transfers

Posted by rrichardson September 19th, 2012, 2:46 pm Post a Comment

Michael D. Clark reports:

The financially troubled Little Miami Schools will appeal a state board ruling that may clear the way for a portion of its Warren County district to transfer into adjacent Kings Schools.

The Little Miami Board of Education voted this week to pursue the appeal process allowed under state law in an effort to negate a decision earlier this month by the Ohio State Board of Education.

That ruling initially allows for the Miami Bluffs community along the border of the two districts to attempt a transfer to Kings.

Despite approval by the state board, officials in neither district say they want the transfer, which would affect about 500 homes near the district’s shared border in Hamilton Township.

Kings school board passed a resolution in 2011 rejecting the idea of accepting any homes from any adjacent district.

“This was the first opportunity Little Miami has been able to have a say in this entire proceeding,” said Little Miami Schools Superintendent Greg Power of the local board’s vote Tuesday. “We look forward to having our case heard.”

According to the Little Miami board’s resolution, the board “believes that should the transfer of the property in question occur, the district would incur a substantial negative financial impact in the form of lost property tax revenue.” estimated to be about $1.1 million annually.

Little Miami board vice president Mike Cremeans said the proposed transfer “throws us farther behind in trying to get out of fiscal emergency.”

The district’s attorney will have 15 days – after receiving notification from the state board regarding its recent ruling – to file its appeal with the board.

no comments yet

Posted in: Schools |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , ,

ThuSep13

Request to join Kings district rejected

Posted by rrichardson September 13th, 2012, 3:10 pm Post a Comment

Michael D. Clark reports:

A subdivision on the border of Little Miami Schools got state approval this week to join an adjacent district but officials at Kings Schools have already voted to reject the attempt to move in.

Earlier this week the Ohio State Board of Education approved a request by some residents in the Miami Bluffs community, which is part of the Little Miami school system, to merge into the nearby Kings district.

The two Warren County districts share a border in Hamilton Township, along Kings’ eastern boundary line.

Despite approval by the state board, officials in neither district said Thursday they want a merger.

In anticipation of such mergers, Kings school board passed a resolution in 2011 rejecting the idea of accepting any of homes from any adjacent district.

“The Kings Board of Education expressed their stand on the issue of land transfer in a resolution in October, 2011,” Kings officials said in a statement.

“The Kings Local School District Board of Education desires … to clearly express its position that it will decline any proposed transfer of school district territory from adjoining school districts.”

But the outcome is unclear in this unusual case.

Under Ohio law the home district that would receive a transferred community – in this case, Kings – usually has the final say on any attempted merger into its school system area.

“We’re concerned about district’s ability to take on more neighborhoods,” said Kings Superintendent Valerie Browning, who added that to allow the merge would set a precedence that school officials want to avoid.

And Little Miami Schools Superintendent Greg Power complained that losing a subdivision of dozens of homes and about 75 students to Kings would cut into the financially troubled district’s local school tax revenue.

“If this transfer occurs, we stand to lose around $1.5 million in tax revenue annually,” said Power, whose district remains insolvent in state-designated “fiscal emergency” and under state control.

Power said district officials and board members for Little Miami plan to meet next week to explore legal options.

 

no comments yet

Posted in: Schools |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , ,

MonJan30

Jury: Hamilton Township police conspired to raid party

Posted by rrichardson January 30th, 2012, 11:38 am Post a Comment
Hamilton Twp. Police Lt. Det. Jeff Braley

Jeff Braley, then the lead detective for Hamilton Township Police, testifies in the second murder trial of Ryan Widmer, of Mason. File photo

Janice Morse reports:

A federal court case ended on two parallel tracks Friday, in favor of a Warren County couple and two young men who sued police and won.

An eight-member jury unanimously agreed that Hamilton Township police conspired to violate the plaintiffs’ rights and raided a party illegally in 2007 – and word of that decision reached lawyers just moments after they had hammered out a settlement of monetary damages, said attorney Konrad Kircher.

He and attorney Michael Arnold represented the plaintiffs who sued the police, Ted and Mary Pritchard and their party guests, Zachary Christman and Kevin Clark.

The jury’s verdict still prevails on the facts of the case, Kircher said, because that was what both sides agreed upon. However, he said, the plaintiffs will receive the settlement amount of $350,000, not the amounts the jury set: $29,114 for each of the Pritchards, $4,325 for Christman and $8,007 for Clark, plus attorneys’ fees.

Kircher said that, as time passed, both sides worried the jury might be hung, without the required unanimous verdict, and neither side wanted to face another trial after nearly five years of court battles.

Even though the jury-set amounts were more modest, Kircher said the fact that the jury decided to impose punitive damages was significant. “You just rarely see that happen,” Kircher said, noting that, in his 20-year law career he has never had a jury grant a punitive award against a government official. “The jury had to find that they acted in bad faith, with ill will, actual malice – and most government officials are able to establish that they were just negligent, that they made a mistake. That wasn’t what we had in this case.”

Wilson Weisenfelder, a lawyer who represented the police, said he was disappointed in the verdict and still maintained his clients did nothing wrong.

At least 40 times, Judge Susan J. Dlott read the word, “yes,” repeating the jury’s findings that the defendants had violated the plaintiffs’ rights. The defendants were Police Chief Frank Richardson, now deceased; two lieutenants, Phil Johnson and Jeff Braley; plus Officer Roger Gilbert and his wife, Gail, a civilian.

Mary Pritchard wept. She later said it was because she felt the verdict vindicated her and her husband and, “it lifts a burden off my shoulders.”

The raid happened Aug. 10, 2007, after Braley, acting on an unverified tip that the Pritchards were throwing an underage drinking bash, lined up state liquor agents and other personnel to raid the party. He drove past the Pritchards’ property a half-dozen times and saw no laws being broken. Then, Braley and Johnson conferred. Next, Johnson asked Gilbert to have his wife call the dispatch center to report she was hearing a loud party at the Pritchards’ even though she was miles away at her home in another county.

After that call, nearly two dozen officers swarmed the property; Christman and Clark were arrested. Christman was then 18 and was charged with underage consumption even though he was drinking under his father’s supervision on private property, which is allowed under Ohio law. Clark, then 21, was arrested for disorderly conduct after he used his cell phone to check a text message after an officer ordered him to stop using his phone to videotape the raid. Their charges were dropped.

Later, two anonymous letters, possibly from other police officers, arrived, alerting the Pritchards to Mrs. Gilbert’s bogus phone call and other details. To the letter-writers, Mrs. Pritchard says: “Thank God…thanks for your honesty.”

Braley was then a detective lieutenant. He resigned last year after controversy over his employment credentials surfaced in an offshoot from the Ryan Widmer murder case. Braley was the lead detective in that case, which ended with Widmer, who last lived in Mason, being convicted of murder in the 2008 bathtub drowning of his newlywed wife, Sarah, 24. Widmer is now serving 15 years to life in prison.

Kircher says he has no idea whether Widmer is guilty or not, but “I would question any investigation Jeff Braley ever did.”

no comments yet

Posted in: News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

FriJan27

No verdict yet in party raid case against Widmer detective

Posted by rrichardson January 27th, 2012, 5:29 pm Post a Comment
Hamilton Twp. Police Lt. Det. Jeff Braley

Former Hamilton Twp. Lt. Det. Jeff Braley testifies in the murder trial of Ryan Widmer, who last lived in Mason. Braley, who resigned from the department, is now embroiled in a non-related civil suit. File photo

Update
The jury has found police in Hamilton Township illegally conspired to raid a party and violated residents’ rights.

MasonBuzz will update this story.

Janice Morse reports:

A federal court jury has told a judge it will continue working into the evening, after 10 hours of deliberations.

The jury, which is considering whether police in Hamilton Township illegally raided a party and violated residents’ rights, began with two hours of deliberations Thursday.

At last check late this afternoon, jurors had deliberated another eight hours without reaching a verdict.

Residents Mary and Ted Pritchard sued Hamilton Township officers, alleging that officers raided an adult birthday party on their property in 2007 under false pretenses, assuming the Pritchards were throwing an underage drinking bash.

After a half-dozen checks on the property revealed no violations, a police lieutenant asked one of his subordinates to have his wife make a phone call from her home in another county and report that she heard loud noise coming from the block where the Pritchards live. After that call, nearly two dozen officers eventually swarmed the property.

The Pritchards later learned about the call from an anonymous letter, possibly from an honest police officer troubled by that call, their lawyer said.

Police deny any wrongdoing; their lawyer says they were just trying to do their jobs and there was no conspiracy to raid the property.

Two of the Pritchards’ partygoers also sued the police, alleging false arrest. Their charges were eventually dismissed but both had to hire lawyers.

Zachary Christman was then 18 and was charged with underage consumption even though he was drinking under his father’s supervision on private property, which is allowed under Ohio law.

Kevin Clark, then 21, was arrested for disorderly conduct after he used his cell phone to check a text message after an officer ordered him to stop using his phone to videotape the raid.

The plaintiffs have not specified an amount of monetary damages they are seeking.

The defendants in the case include the estate of the now-deceased Hamilton Township police chief, Frank Richardson, as well as a current officer, Lt. Phil Johnson and former officers Roger Gilbert and Jeff Braley.

Braley was then a detective lieutenant but resigned last year after controversy over his employment credentials surfaced in an offshoot from the Ryan Widmer murder case. Braley was the lead detective in that case, which ended with Widmer being convicted of murder in the 2008 bathtub drowning of his newlywed wife, Sarah, 24.

Widmer, who last lived in Mason, is now serving 15 years to life in prison.

Several of Widmer’s suppporters came to court to listen to Braley’s testimony and observe the trial, which began Monday.

no comments yet

Posted in: News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

ThuJan26

Civil suit against Widmer detective goes to the jury

Posted by rrichardson January 26th, 2012, 2:28 pm Post a Comment
Hamilton Twp. Police Lt. Det. Jeff Braley

Former Hamilton Twp. Lt. Det. Jeff Braley testifies in the murder trial of Ryan Widmer, who last lived in Mason and was convicted in his third trial. Braley, who resigned from the department, is now embroiled in a non-related civil suit. File photo

Janice Morse reports:

A federal court jury is about to begin deliberating in the case of Warren County residents who accuse police of unlawfully raiding an adult birthday party, falsely arresting two partygoers and maliciously prosecuting them.

As of 1:30 p.m., Judge Susan J. Dlott was still providing jurors with detailed instructions as to how to decide the case under both state and federal laws. The trial began Monday in U.S. District Court, Cincinnati, over a party that happened four and a half years ago.

In their civil lawsuit, Hamilton Township residents Ted and Mary Pritchard and two young men who attended their 2007 party — Kevin Clark and Zach Christman — allege police conspired to raid the Pritchards’ party under false pretenses, then tried to cover-up their alleged wrongdoing. Judge Dlott has already ruled that Christman’s right against false arrest was violated under federal law, but the jury must decide whether his right against false arrest was violated under state law.

Wilson Weisenfelder, a lawyer defending Hamilton Township police, asked the jury to grant little or no monetary damages for Christman. Weisenfelder also argued that there was no evidence of a conspiracy or cover-up. He again repeated what he had told the jury in opening statements — that the case was about police trying to do their jobs.

Konrad Kircher, who represents the Pritchards, Clark and Christman, said that, for jurors to believe that, they would have to “ignore a mountain of contrary evidence.”

He said the Pritchards have a constitutional right to be free from unlawful intrusion of police on their premises — and that police concocted a scenario to try to justify going onto the Pritchards’ property. That included a bogus telephone report of loud noise coming from the property, which is located on an acre of land largely isolated from other homes, Kircher said.

A Hamilton Township officer’s wife, Gail Gilbert, who was then living in Butler County, miles away from the party location, called a dispatcher in Warren County and reported: “I hear a lot of yelling and screaming from the 10,000 block of Schlotmann (Road)…I’d rather remain anonymous…it sounds like a big-ol’ party or somethin’ goin’ on.”

Kircher told the jury that Mrs. Gilbert made the call after her husband’s supervisor, Lt. Phil Johnson, asked Officer Roger Gilbert to request the call be made. Kircher played a recording of call for the jury to hear and said, “I want you to ask yourselves: Is this a reluctant wallflower who doesn’t want to cooperate?” Kircher suggested Mrs. Gilbert was an enthusiastic participant in the alleged conspiracy, which could have helped advance her husband’s career if everything had gone as planned.

(more…)

no comments yet

Posted in: News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

TueJan24

Widmer detective denies conspiracy in birthday raid

Posted by rrichardson January 24th, 2012, 8:42 am Post a Comment
Jeff Braley

Jeff Braley, then the lead detective for Hamilton Township Police, testifies in the second murder trial of Ryan Widmer, of Mason. File photo

Janice Morse reports:

The former detective from the Ryan Widmer murder case testified for about a half hour Monday in an unrelated federal court civil-rights trial, denying allegations that he and other officers “conspired” to raid an adult birthday party under false pretenses.

“I didn’t put together anything, sir…I did not plan anything,” Jeff Braley, a former police lieutenant, said in response to a question from Konrad Kircher, a lawyer representing Ted and Mary Pritchard of Hamilton Township and two other people.

Kircher questioned Braley about events surrounding the 2007 incident on the Pritchards’ property.

Kircher did not ask Braley about his employment credentials as part of his testimony today, although Kircher was allowed to explore that topic in a pretrial deposition.

Braley has denied making false statements found in his employment records. He resigned last year after an investigation into those documents.

In the Pritchard case, the family and their partygoers allege that nearly two dozen officers stormed the property in 2007 based on unsupported suspicions of underage drinking, court records say. The party was being thrown for Ted Pritchard’s 52nd birthday and for the Pritchards’ son’s 21st birthday, Kircher said.

The Pritchard family later learned that the raid happened partly because a Hamilton Township officer’s wife called the Hamilton Township police department from her Butler County home, pretending to be calling from Warren County and reporting she heard loud noise coming from the Prtichards’ party, court records say.

Prospective jurors in the Pritchard case denied recognizing Braley from the highly publicized Widmer case, which ended with Widmer, now 31, who last lived in Mason, being convicted in the 2008 bathtub drowning of his wife. His case went to trial three times before he was convicted a year ago. Only two of the prospective jurors in the Pritchard case said they followed any phase of the Widmer case closely.

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

MonOct31

Ex-preschool owner sentenced to 30 years for rape

Posted by rrichardson October 31st, 2011, 5:02 pm Post a Comment

A former Warren County preschool owner was sent to prison for 30 years last week after pleading guilty to 10 charges of rape involving two girls who were not enrolled at the school.

John Foster, 36, of Deerfield Township was set to go on trial Oct. 31 on 20 counts of rape, four counts of sexual battery and two counts of gross sexual imposition involving incidents from 1999 to 2003.

Foster and his wife, Cindy, had operated the Primrose School at River’s Bend in Hamilton Township in a franchise agreement since 2008. The corporate office closed the school following Foster’s July arrest although Warren County sheriff’s officials said no children from the school were molested.

Foster also faces federal charges levied last month for allegedly keeping dozens of images and movies of child pornography on his computer.

Investigators discovered the child pornography, downloaded between 2004 and 2007, when they searched Foster’s home in July, after he was charged with abusing two children in Warren County.

Authorities have said the rape and sexual battery charges involve abuse that occurred on multiple occasions from 1999 to 2003.

The victim was less than 13 years old, according to a court document.  One incident allegedly happened at Foster’s Deerfield Township home.

Foster will serve 30 years with no opportunity for parole. He also was designated as a Tier III sex offender.

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

ThuSep22

Deerfield Township preschool owner charged with keeping child porn on computer

Posted by rrichardson September 22nd, 2011, 12:34 pm Post a Comment

John Foster A former preschool owner from Deerfield Township was charged Thursday with keeping dozens of images and movies of child pornography on his computer.

A federal grand jury indicted John Foster, 36, with 24 counts of receiving child pornography and one count of possession of child pornography.

The federal charges against Foster, who also faces rape and sexual battery charges in state court, could send him to prison for 20 years if he is convicted.

Foster is the former owner of the Primrose School franchise in Hamilton Township.

The Enquirer’s Dan Horn has more details about the latest charges:

Federal prosecutors say that between 2004 and 2007 Foster downloaded sexually explicit images to his computer and received about 25 compact discs depicting the sexual abuse of children.

Investigators discovered the child pornography when they searched Foster’s home in July, after he was charged with abusing two children in Warren County.

Neither the rape charges nor the pornography charges involve children from the school, and the Warren County Sheriff’s Office has said it has received no reports of incidents at the school.

Authorities have said the rape and sexual battery charges involve abuse that occurred on multiple occasions from 1999 to 2003.

The victim was less than 13 years old, according to a court document.  One incident allegedly happened at Foster’s Deerfield Township home.

Foster is in jail pending an Oct. 31 trial on the rape and sexual battery charges.  No trial date has been set for the federal child pornography charges.

The pornography charges will be handled separately from the rape case and could carry as much or more prison time if Foster is convicted.

Federal laws are tough on child pornography and often are easier cases for authorities to prove because they do not require testimony from a child or other physical evidence, reports Horn.

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

SunJun12

Ryan Widmer: “I’ll never give up”

Posted by rrichardson June 12th, 2011, 9:22 am Post a Comment

Ryan Widmer interview

For the first time in his nearly three-year saga, convicted wife-killer Ryan Widmer agreed to tell his side of the story to local media in a recent 2½-hour interview with The Enquirer.

Widmer, 30, of Mason, is appealing his Feb. 15 murder conviction in the 2008 drowning of his wife, Sarah, 24.

From a close-security prison, Widmer spoke to Enquirer reporter Janice Morse about his conviction — and his commitment to prove his innocence.

His only other interview, with “Dateline NBC,” was drastically cut to just four minutes at the tail-end of a two-hour program that aired nationally May 6.

In a state prison near Lebanon, Ryan Widmer lies awake, in disbelief that anyone could think he is some sort of criminal mastermind.

“I mean, I’m a regular guy, but yet one night I grow into the perfect assassin? That’s really what they’re trying to make me out to be,” Widmer said.

If he had killed his wife, Sarah, when she drowned in the couple’s suburban bathroom in 2008, he would have pulled off a near-perfect crime, he said.

No evidence directly links him to her death. He suffered no wounds. If there was a struggle that night, there was no obvious sign of it.

“In my eyes, it’s clear-cut that I’m innocent,” he said.

Jurors disagreed.

All but a handful of the 36 Warren County jurors who heard Widmer’s three trials voted him guilty of murder. Some theorized Widmer drowned his wife in the toilet, though prosecutors argued she drowned in the bathtub.

After two mistrials and much public debate, some hailed Widmer’s Feb. 15 conviction as justice served; others decried it as a horrible injustice.

In the Enquirer interview, Widmer revealed why he never testified in his own defense, which the “Dateline” segment did not address. He discussed being prosecuted and subjected to intense scrutiny. He described what happened the night 24-year-old Sarah Steward Widmer’s life ended – and his life changed forever.

“In the back of my mind, I know that I’m here 15 years to life,” he said in a visiting room at Warren Correctional Institution. “But I’ll never give up hope … there’s just too many things that I feel like could happen to make this right.”

To that end, Widmer, 30, keeps paper and a pen handy. He jots down angles to be explored, questions to ask lawyers working to get his conviction overturned.

That conviction, prosecutors say, is supported by circumstantial evidence and suspicious bruising on Sarah Widmer’s head and neck.

Defense lawyers counter that medics repeatedly manipulated her neck and stuck it with needles. They’re trying to prove that an undiagnosed medical problem led to her drowning and that a misguided jury convicted Widmer.

“All I do 24/7 is think about this,” Widmer said. “I think the only reason I sleep at night is I wear myself out mentally.”

Before his wife drowned on Aug. 11, 2008, Ryan Widmer was an ordinary citizen with no criminal history. But after 114 days of marriage, the college-educated Colerain Township native was accused of being a killer. The strange “bathtub murder” case drew national attention and riveted his hometown.

“I’ve lost my wife, the person I love most, and a day later I’m fighting for my life,” he said. “I was blind to the system. I thought there was no way you would ever be convicted of something you didn’t do.”

He traces his predicament to people like Jeff Braley.

Braley, the lead detective on the case, recently resigned from the Hamilton Township police force after an investigation raised concerns about misrepresentations in his employment credentials.

Widmer thinks Braley, who had little death-investigation training, likely influenced the county coroner to call Sarah’s death a homicide. That set the stage for Widmer to be charged with murder less than 48 hours after his wife drowned.

Widmer said he was aghast to learn he was accused. “How can this be happening?” All he can figure is, “They jumped to a conclusion and they were never backing down.”

Widmer said if he were guilty, he would have admitted it to spare his family from emotional and financial ruin. Legal battles drained $500,000.

He stands by his decision to reject prosecutors’ plea offer: five years in prison, at most, for manslaughter. “I would have to admit to taking somebody’s life – my wife’s life – which I didn’t do,” he said.

About the night his wife drowned, Widmer said: “I can’t explain what happened to Sarah. I wasn’t in the bathroom with her.” He has no information, he said, that would shed light on her drowning – so that’s the biggest reason he didn’t testify.

If he hadn’t listened to a recording of his 911 call reporting his wife unresponsive, Widmer said, he would have recalled only the basics of what he said. He misspoke a couple times on the call, he said, because he was upset – and he feels he’s been pilloried for it.

For instance, during the 911 call, Widmer said he found Sarah in the tub face-down. A nurse testified that he told her Sarah was face-up. Widmer said the conflicting statements, portrayed as incriminating in his trials, were just an honest mistake made while he was flustered. Wid- mer said she was face-up, with her whole head underwater.

“It’s a hard thing to remember exactly, because my main concern was her,” he said.

“You’re taught to call 911 if you need help,” he said. “I did what I was supposed to do, and look where it got me.”

He said it’s unfair that other people are allowed to misspeak – but he isn’t. During his three trials, some witnesses changed testimony, omitted facts or said they forgot certain facts, he said.

During the Enquirer interview, Widmer frequently interrupted himself and spoke in incomplete sentences. His phrasing was sometimes awkward. People who know him say that is how he typically speaks, no matter the topic.

When Widmer told a dispatcher his wife fell asleep in the tub, it was not an attempt to concoct a story to cover up a forced drowning, as prosecutors asserted, Widmer said. Rather, he assumed his wife had fallen asleep because he had found her asleep in the tub before. One evening, “she literally fell asleep on me in mid-sentence,” he said.

His wife, a dental hygienist, also slept during work breaks and complained to her Fort Thomas co-workers about severe headaches, making her see spots.

After she died, authorities “didn’t do their jobs” to fully investigate, Widmer said.

“She was not feeling well … I don’t know what happened to her,” he said, “and hopefully we can find out because, unfortunately, I’m left to prove that I’m innocent.”

Widmer said incidents of other drownings traced to seizures raise awareness that people can drown because of medical issues, or can die suddenly without explanation. “You can’t just jump to a (conclusion) like you did on me … and not even look at anything else,” he said.

“The sad thing about this whole situation is that Sarah, my wife, has gotten lost so much in all of this,” he said.

A year and three months after his wife died, he became involved with another Sarah – Sarah Manherz of New York.

“It doesn’t take away from the love I have for my wife, Sarah,” he said.

Widmer knows local people were shocked in May when “Dateline NBC” revealed Manherz had given birth to his son last August. But he said: “People that lose a loved one move into different relationships all the time. Mine’s being scrutinized more because my whole life’s been scrutinized.”

After “Dateline” first aired a segment on his case in September 2009, dozens of men and women reached out via emails, text messages and phone calls. It felt good knowing people believed in him, Widmer said.

Among the supporters was Manherz, a pretty blonde who worked as a medical technician.

“One thing led to another and we fell in love,” Widmer said.

Manherz, now 30, believed she was unable to get pregnant. But after being intimate once in November 2009, the couple conceived a child. Widmer initially bemoaned the timing: His second trial was looming.

“But when the news sunk in, I was just overjoyed. It was like, ‘Something good is finally happening in my life.’”

Widmer had thought the arrival of his son was a sign that he might be acquitted: “I thought, ‘God would never give me this unless things were going to be OK.’”

Now known as inmate No. A599952 in a close-security prison, Widmer said his desire to “be there” for his son strengthens his resolve to regain his freedom.

Manherz and others bring the baby to visit Widmer in prison.

“He’s another reason that I’ll never give up,” Widmer said.

What did you think of Widmer’s interview?  Has it changed your opinion of the case?

Related Links

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

WedMay4

“Dateline NBC” episode reveals Widmer fathered a child

Posted by rrichardson May 4th, 2011, 1:34 pm Post a Comment

A “Dateline NBC” episode, scheduled to air Friday, confirms what has long been rumored: Ryan Widmer became a father while awaiting his third trial on a murder charge, reports the Enquirer’s Janice Morse.

In a video clip promoting the show, above, Dateline shows images of Widmer, his baby and the child’s mother, who tells Dateline: “There’s no way that he could have done this – ever.”

Names of the baby and the woman are not disclosed in the promotion, but the clip says the baby was born “in the summer after trial No. 2,” which means the child would now be less than a year old.

The program says Widmer met the woman after Dateline broadcast a segment on his case in September 2009.

The new episode, called “The Bathtub Mystery,” runs 9 p.m. -11 p.m. Friday – two hours.

Widmer, 30, of Mason, is appealing his Feb. 15 murder conviction in the 2008 drowning of his wife, Sarah, 24.

A producer said the show could be postponed until Sunday because the network might instead air a segment on the death of Osama bin Laden.

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Connect with MasonBuzz

Subscribe

Get community news delivered straight to your inbox.

Featured Businesses

Reach the Audience That Matters Most to You!

We can deliver the highly targeted audience your business needs to attract new customers. Start building your ad now!

Send us Photos

  • Attach a JPEG (.jpg) photo to your story. Maximum file size is 4 MB.
  • Add a caption, include names & communities of people pictured. (Caption limit: 500 characters, including spaces)

Recent Photos

Clynn Yeoh ALECIA LIPTON Mason Comets Lebanon powder Benjie Pauline Brown Hillman volunteers Hillman volunteers Luke Tsai The Beach
View more photos >