Posts Tagged ‘trial’

MonMar26

Warren Co. drug dealer caught after 7-year ‘lunch’

Posted by rrichardson March 26th, 2012, 5:57 pm Post a Comment

Paul McKibben reports:

James Scott Authorities finally apprehended a convicted cocaine dealer who left his Warren County trial almost seven years ago for lunch and never returned.

Dayton, Ohio police arrested James Scott, 46, at approximately 11:45 p.m. Saturday on unrelated criminal damaging, obstructing official business and resisting arrest charges. He gave police no address but while he was on trial in the fall of 2005 he lived in Warren County’s Clearcreek Township.

John Burke, commander of the Warren County Drug Task Force, said Monday officials gave information to U.S. marshals about Scott. The television show “America’s Most Wanted” featured Scott several years ago. Burke said he guesses that Scott was assisted in being a fugitive.

“The other issue is he’s apparently kept out of trouble this amount of time. Otherwise he would have shown up somewhere else in the country,” Burke said.

Burke said officials had several different potential locations for Scott over the past seven years and they never stopped looking for him. Burke said Scott he didn’t know for sure where Scott might have lived but officials had tips. In a news release, the task force said several tips proved not to be fruitful.

The jury in the October 2005 trial convicted Scott on nine counts of trafficking in cocaine and two counts of possession of cocaine. All are but one are first degree felonies.

During the trial, Scott departed for lunch after jurors received the case and never returned. Scott was free on a $50,000 bond during the trial. The jury rendered their verdict without him present.

“He had … an ankle bracelet that when he went back home like for lunch, he took the bracelet off and then left,” Burke said. “So that’s what happened with him.”

Burke previously said that Scott was considered a major cocaine dealer in the area. When he was arrested in February 2005, after making several undercover purchases, Scott was found with 1.5 pounds of crack cocaine and 1 pound of powder cocaine. Police considered Scott to be armed and dangerous in 2005.

Scott faces more than 50 years in prison for the 2005 conviction. He’s lodged in the Montgomery County jail. Burke said he didn’t think authorities would be charging Scott for escape given the amount of prison time he already faces.

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News, Warren County |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

FriFeb17

Judge declares mistrial in Mason child rape case

Posted by rrichardson February 17th, 2012, 8:18 pm Post a Comment
Jorge Velasquez
Jorge Velasquez: Warren County Jail

A  judge declared a mistrial Friday after a Warren County jury reported being hopelessly deadlocked on whether a Mason man sexually assaulted and raped his girlfriend’s 9-year-old daughter.

Jorge Velasquez, 33, had been charged with one count of rape of a child and a lesser charge of gross sexual imposition.  He pleaded not guilty to both charges.

The jury of eight women and four men deliberated for just over five hours Friday before reporting to Warren County Common Pleas Court Judge James L. Flannery that they could not reach a verdict.

The jury split 6-4 in favor of acquittal with two jurors undecided, according to defense attorney Justin Bartlett, who spoke with jurors after the proceedings.

Prosecutors will retry the case, said Assistant Warren County Prosecutor Theresa Hiett.

Velasquez took the stand Friday in his own defense to counter allegations made by the now 14-year-old girl, who says he fondled and digitally penetrated her when she was 9.

The girl testified Thursday that she regarded Velasquez as a father figure.  Velasquez and the girl’s mother have two other children together.

The alleged abuse began when her mother began working the night shift in late summer of 2006, leaving her and a toddler brother home alone with Velasquez, the girl said.

The abuse stopped several months later when her mother stopped working the night shift, she said.

“He told me not to tell my mom or else,” she told jurors.  “I was scared because I thought if I told someone he would hurt me or anyone in my family.”

Both Velasquez and the girl’s mother testified that the girl fabricated the accusations to retaliate against Velasquez for preventing her from seeing an adult boyfriend.

“Nothing ever happened,” Velasquez told the jury.  “[The victim] just said it now because [she] wants me in jail out of the way.  She wants me to leave her alone so she can be with him.”

The boyfriend, Nehemias Cristobel, testified Friday that the victim confided in him last year about the alleged abuse and that he encouraged her to report it.

Under cross examination, Cristobel, now 22,  admitted his relationship with the girl began when he was 20 and she was 12, but insisted that her mother and Velasquez approved of it on the condition their dates were chaperoned.

“Everyone tells lies in this world but I don’t think she would tell a lie this big,” he said.

The girl’s mother and the defendant’s brother, Guillermo Velasquez, both testified that the abuse could not have happened because the girl stayed overnight with relatives on days her mother worked the night shift.

The girl’s mother painted a portrait of an unruly and out-of-control teenager who made the accusations five years after the alleged incidents in response to efforts by her and Velasquez to prevent her from seeing Cristobel.  When she tried to take away the girl’s cell phone, a gift from Cristobel, the girl struck and pushed her, she told jurors.

The mother said she did not report the incident to police because she is an undocumented immigrant and feared deportation.

Defense attorney Justin Bartlett attacked the girl’s credibility, pointing out inconsistencies in her story and arguing that she has a history of lying.

“Our position is that they’re acting as reasonable parents.  They’re trying to prevent their daughter from engaging into a relationship with an adult,” he said.  “She’s upset because her parents are trying to reel her in, control her.”

Hiett questioned the financial motives of the mother in protecting Velasquez, the family’s breadwinner, and asked the jury to consider why a teenage girl would fabricate such “detailed and imaginative” abuse allegations.

“It would have been a lot easier for her to turn around and say this never happened.  There were alternatives for her and yelling rape was not the first one,” said Hiett.

“It’s always the child’s word against the perpetrator’s word.  When is a child’s word enough?”

Bartlett said he was not surprised that the trial ended with a hung jury and said the case hinged on the accuser’s credibility.

“There was the credibility of one person versus three witnesses that came forward to testify consistently,” he said. “I thought it could have been a mistrial; obviously we were hoping for an acquittal.”

If convicted, Velasquez faces a prison term of up to life on the rape charge and 36 months on the charge of gross sexual imposition.  He remains in the Warren County Jail on a $500,000 bond.

No new trial date has yet been set.

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Child rape case goes to the jury

Posted by rrichardson February 17th, 2012, 3:07 pm Post a Comment
Jorge Velasquez
Jorge Velasquez: Warren County Jail

Is Jorge Velasquez a concerned stepfather or is he a sexual abuser and child rapist?

That’s the question before jurors in Warren County Common Pleas Court as they decide the fate of the accused Mason man.

Testimony wrapped up in the second day of trial for Velasquez, 33, who’s charged with one count of rape of a child.  Velasquez has entered a plea of not guilty to the charge, which carries a penalty of up to life in prison.

Prosecutors added a lesser charge of gross sexual imposition for jurors to consider.  The charge, a third-degree felony, carries a prison term of up to 36 months.

The case went to the jury of eight women and four men shortly before 1 p.m.

Velasquez took the stand today in his own defense to counter allegations made by the teenage daughter of his girlfriend, who says he fondled and digitally penetrated her when she was 9.

The girl, now 14, testified Thursday that the alleged abuse began when her mother began working the night shift in late summer of 2006, leaving her and a toddler brother home alone with Velasquez.

The victim testified that the abuse began with the defendant fondling her in bed and then escalated to digital penetration.   The abuse stopped several months later when her mother stopped working the night shift, she said.

“He told me not to tell my mom or else,” she told jurors.  “I was scared because I thought if I told someone he would hurt me or anyone in my family.”

Although Velasquez and the girl’s mother are unmarried, the girl testified she regarded him as a father figure.  Velasquez and the girl’s mother have two other children together.

Velasquez vehemently denied the allegations.  Both he and the girl’s mother testified that she fabricated the accusations to retaliate against him for preventing her from seeing an adult boyfriend.

“Nothing ever happened,” he told the jury.  ”[The victim] just said it now because [she] wants me in jail out of the way.  She wants me to leave her alone so she can be with him.”

The boyfriend, Nehemias Cristobel, testified today that the victim confided in him last year about the alleged abuse and that he encouraged her to tell her mother or a teacher.

Under cross examination, Cristobel, now 22,  admitted that his relationship with the girl began when he was 20 and she was 12, but insisted that her mother and Velasquez approved of it as long as their dates were chaperoned.

He told the jury that an adult man dating a minor child was more socially and culturally acceptable in his native Guatemala, where both the victim and defendant also immigrated from.

“Everyone tells lies in this world but I don’t think she would tell a lie this big,” he said.

Velasquez said the abuse could not have happened because the girl stayed with Velasquez’s brother and sister-in-law overnight on days her mother worked the night shift.

Guillermo Velasquez took the stand Friday and told jurors that his brother, the defendant, was never permitted to be left alone with the girl.  The girl’s mother testified Thursday that she did not trust Velasquez to be left alone with her daughter.

In her closing argument, Assistant Warren County Prosecutor Theresa Hiett questioned why Guillermo Velasquez and the girl’s mother did not notify police about the defendant’s alleged lack of access to the girl.

“Would any of us allow a family member to sit (in jail) when you know you have the ace card in hand?” she asked.

Hiett suggested the girl’s mother might be protecting Velasquez for fear of the financial instability that could result should he be convicted and sent to prison.  Velasquez testified that he is the family’s primary breadwinner, although “not by much.”

She asked the jury to consider why a teenage girl would fabricate such detailed allegations of abuse.

“It would have been a lot easier for her to turn around and say this never happened.  There were alternatives for her and yelling rape was not the first one,” said Hiett.

“It’s always the child’s word against the perpetrator’s word.  When is a child’s word enough?”

Defense attorney Justin Bartlett attacked the girl’s credibility, pointing out inconsistencies in her story and arguing that she has a history of lying.

“Our position is that they’re acting as reasonable parents.  They’re trying to prevent their daughter from engaging into a relationship with an adult,” he said.  “She’s upset because her parents are trying to reel her in, control her.”

MasonBuzz will update this story.

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

ThuFeb16

Teen testifies against ‘stepfather’ in rape trial

Posted by rrichardson February 16th, 2012, 9:05 pm Post a Comment
Jorge Velasquez
Jorge Velasquez: Warren County Jail

Depending on who you ask, Jorge Velasquez is either a concerned and loving stepfather or a sexual abuser and child rapist.

A 14-year-old teenage girl told a Warren County jury Thursday that she was sexually abused and raped by the Mason man — her mother’s live-in boyfriend — when she was 9 years old.

The girl’s mother however, took the stand to paint a different portrait of an unruly and out-of-control teenager who fabricated the accusations to retaliate against Velasquez for preventing her from seeing an adult boyfriend.

The victim was the first witness in the trial of Velasquez, 33, that started Thursday in Warren County Common Pleas Court. Velasquez is charged with one count of rape of a child for the alleged incident, which prosecutors say took place between August 2006 and December 2006.

Velasquez has entered a plea of not guilty to the charge, which carries a penalty of up to life in prison.

The girl said the alleged abuse began when her mother began working the night shift in late summer of 2006, leaving her and a toddler brother home alone with Velasquez.

Although Velasquez and the girl’s mother are unmarried, the girl testified she regarded him as a father figure. Velasquez and the girl’s mother have two other children together.

The victim testified that the abuse began with the defendant fondling her in bed and then escalated to digital penetration. The abuse stopped several months later when her mother stopped working the night shift, she said.

“He told me not to tell my mom or else,” she told jurors. “I was scared because I thought if I told someone he would hurt me or anyone in my family.”

The girl said she confided about the abuse last year to her 22-year-old boyfriend, who encouraged her to seek out a counselor at school. The school reported the accusations to police and to her mother, whom the girl says didn’t believe her claims.

“That made me feel mad,” she said. “My own mother couldn’t believe me.”

The girl’s mother took the stand today and told jurors the abuse could not have happened because she left the girl overnight with a relative on days she worked the night shift.

She testified that the teen made the accusations five years after the alleged incidents in response to efforts by her and Velasquez to prevent her from seeing the adult boyfriend. When she tried to take away the girl’s cell phone, a gift from the boyfriend, the girl struck and pushed her.

With the help of a translator, the mother told jurors she did not report the incident to police because she is undocumented immigrant and feared deportation.

Defense attorney Justin Bartlett attacked the girl’s credibility, pointing out inconsistencies in her story and arguing that she has a history of lying.

“The case falls on credibility,” he told jurors. “The state will ask you to speculate and presume without any evidence. She didn’t like what her parents were telling her. It’s her word versus his word and the mother’s word.”

Testimony will resume at 8:30 a.m. Friday. Bartlett says his client intends to take the stand in his own defense. The trial is expected to wrap up on Friday.

Velasquez has been held at the Warren County Jail on a $500,000 bond since his Nov. 29 arrest.

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Trial begins in case of Mason man accused of child rape

Posted by rrichardson February 16th, 2012, 7:00 am Post a Comment
Jorge Velasquez
Jorge Velasquez: Warren County Jail

Jury selection is underway in Warren County Common Pleas Court in the case of a Mason man accused of raping a child.

Jorge Velasquez, 33, is charged with one count of rape for allegedly engaging in sexual conduct with a child who was “living separate and apart” from him and who was less than 13 years of age. Court documents list the age of the child as 9.

Velasquez has entered a plea of not guilty to the charges.   A jury trial is scheduled to start Thursday and last two days.

Prosecutors say Velasquez, the longtime boyfriend of the girl’s mother, digitally penetrated the girl’s vagina.   The alleged crimes happened in Mason between August 2006 and December 2006, according to prosecutors.

The charge, a first-degree felony, carries a penalty of up to life in prison.

Velasquez has been  held at the Warren County Jail on a $500,000 bond since his Nov. 29 arrest.

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

MonJan30

Jury: Hamilton Township police conspired to raid party

Posted by rrichardson January 30th, 2012, 11:38 am Post a Comment
Hamilton Twp. Police Lt. Det. Jeff Braley

Jeff Braley, then the lead detective for Hamilton Township Police, testifies in the second murder trial of Ryan Widmer, of Mason. File photo

Janice Morse reports:

A federal court case ended on two parallel tracks Friday, in favor of a Warren County couple and two young men who sued police and won.

An eight-member jury unanimously agreed that Hamilton Township police conspired to violate the plaintiffs’ rights and raided a party illegally in 2007 – and word of that decision reached lawyers just moments after they had hammered out a settlement of monetary damages, said attorney Konrad Kircher.

He and attorney Michael Arnold represented the plaintiffs who sued the police, Ted and Mary Pritchard and their party guests, Zachary Christman and Kevin Clark.

The jury’s verdict still prevails on the facts of the case, Kircher said, because that was what both sides agreed upon. However, he said, the plaintiffs will receive the settlement amount of $350,000, not the amounts the jury set: $29,114 for each of the Pritchards, $4,325 for Christman and $8,007 for Clark, plus attorneys’ fees.

Kircher said that, as time passed, both sides worried the jury might be hung, without the required unanimous verdict, and neither side wanted to face another trial after nearly five years of court battles.

Even though the jury-set amounts were more modest, Kircher said the fact that the jury decided to impose punitive damages was significant. “You just rarely see that happen,” Kircher said, noting that, in his 20-year law career he has never had a jury grant a punitive award against a government official. “The jury had to find that they acted in bad faith, with ill will, actual malice – and most government officials are able to establish that they were just negligent, that they made a mistake. That wasn’t what we had in this case.”

Wilson Weisenfelder, a lawyer who represented the police, said he was disappointed in the verdict and still maintained his clients did nothing wrong.

At least 40 times, Judge Susan J. Dlott read the word, “yes,” repeating the jury’s findings that the defendants had violated the plaintiffs’ rights. The defendants were Police Chief Frank Richardson, now deceased; two lieutenants, Phil Johnson and Jeff Braley; plus Officer Roger Gilbert and his wife, Gail, a civilian.

Mary Pritchard wept. She later said it was because she felt the verdict vindicated her and her husband and, “it lifts a burden off my shoulders.”

The raid happened Aug. 10, 2007, after Braley, acting on an unverified tip that the Pritchards were throwing an underage drinking bash, lined up state liquor agents and other personnel to raid the party. He drove past the Pritchards’ property a half-dozen times and saw no laws being broken. Then, Braley and Johnson conferred. Next, Johnson asked Gilbert to have his wife call the dispatch center to report she was hearing a loud party at the Pritchards’ even though she was miles away at her home in another county.

After that call, nearly two dozen officers swarmed the property; Christman and Clark were arrested. Christman was then 18 and was charged with underage consumption even though he was drinking under his father’s supervision on private property, which is allowed under Ohio law. Clark, then 21, was arrested for disorderly conduct after he used his cell phone to check a text message after an officer ordered him to stop using his phone to videotape the raid. Their charges were dropped.

Later, two anonymous letters, possibly from other police officers, arrived, alerting the Pritchards to Mrs. Gilbert’s bogus phone call and other details. To the letter-writers, Mrs. Pritchard says: “Thank God…thanks for your honesty.”

Braley was then a detective lieutenant. He resigned last year after controversy over his employment credentials surfaced in an offshoot from the Ryan Widmer murder case. Braley was the lead detective in that case, which ended with Widmer, who last lived in Mason, being convicted of murder in the 2008 bathtub drowning of his newlywed wife, Sarah, 24. Widmer is now serving 15 years to life in prison.

Kircher says he has no idea whether Widmer is guilty or not, but “I would question any investigation Jeff Braley ever did.”

no comments yet

Posted in: News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

FriJan27

No verdict yet in party raid case against Widmer detective

Posted by rrichardson January 27th, 2012, 5:29 pm Post a Comment
Hamilton Twp. Police Lt. Det. Jeff Braley

Former Hamilton Twp. Lt. Det. Jeff Braley testifies in the murder trial of Ryan Widmer, who last lived in Mason. Braley, who resigned from the department, is now embroiled in a non-related civil suit. File photo

Update
The jury has found police in Hamilton Township illegally conspired to raid a party and violated residents’ rights.

MasonBuzz will update this story.

Janice Morse reports:

A federal court jury has told a judge it will continue working into the evening, after 10 hours of deliberations.

The jury, which is considering whether police in Hamilton Township illegally raided a party and violated residents’ rights, began with two hours of deliberations Thursday.

At last check late this afternoon, jurors had deliberated another eight hours without reaching a verdict.

Residents Mary and Ted Pritchard sued Hamilton Township officers, alleging that officers raided an adult birthday party on their property in 2007 under false pretenses, assuming the Pritchards were throwing an underage drinking bash.

After a half-dozen checks on the property revealed no violations, a police lieutenant asked one of his subordinates to have his wife make a phone call from her home in another county and report that she heard loud noise coming from the block where the Pritchards live. After that call, nearly two dozen officers eventually swarmed the property.

The Pritchards later learned about the call from an anonymous letter, possibly from an honest police officer troubled by that call, their lawyer said.

Police deny any wrongdoing; their lawyer says they were just trying to do their jobs and there was no conspiracy to raid the property.

Two of the Pritchards’ partygoers also sued the police, alleging false arrest. Their charges were eventually dismissed but both had to hire lawyers.

Zachary Christman was then 18 and was charged with underage consumption even though he was drinking under his father’s supervision on private property, which is allowed under Ohio law.

Kevin Clark, then 21, was arrested for disorderly conduct after he used his cell phone to check a text message after an officer ordered him to stop using his phone to videotape the raid.

The plaintiffs have not specified an amount of monetary damages they are seeking.

The defendants in the case include the estate of the now-deceased Hamilton Township police chief, Frank Richardson, as well as a current officer, Lt. Phil Johnson and former officers Roger Gilbert and Jeff Braley.

Braley was then a detective lieutenant but resigned last year after controversy over his employment credentials surfaced in an offshoot from the Ryan Widmer murder case. Braley was the lead detective in that case, which ended with Widmer being convicted of murder in the 2008 bathtub drowning of his newlywed wife, Sarah, 24.

Widmer, who last lived in Mason, is now serving 15 years to life in prison.

Several of Widmer’s suppporters came to court to listen to Braley’s testimony and observe the trial, which began Monday.

no comments yet

Posted in: News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Mason man accused of child rape heads to court today

Posted by rrichardson January 27th, 2012, 12:02 pm Post a Comment
Jorge Velasquez

Jorge Velasquez: Warren County Jail

A Mason man accused of raping a child will appear in Warren County Common Pleas Court today.

A pretrial hearing is set for 2 p.m. for Jorge Velasquez,who’s charged with one count of rape for allegedly engaging in sexual conduct with a child who was “living separate and apart” from him and who was less than 13 years of age. Court documents list the age of the child as 9.

Velasquez, 33, has entered a plea of not guilty to the charges.   A two-day jury trial is set to begin Feb. 16 in Warren County Common Pleas Court.

The alleged crimes happened in Mason between August 2006 and December 2006, according to prosecutors. The charge, a first-degree felony, carries a penalty of up to life in prison.

Velasquez is being held at the Warren County Jail on a $500,000 surety bond. He is ordered not to have contact with minors under the age of 18 should he post bail.

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

ThuJan26

Civil suit against Widmer detective goes to the jury

Posted by rrichardson January 26th, 2012, 2:28 pm Post a Comment
Hamilton Twp. Police Lt. Det. Jeff Braley

Former Hamilton Twp. Lt. Det. Jeff Braley testifies in the murder trial of Ryan Widmer, who last lived in Mason and was convicted in his third trial. Braley, who resigned from the department, is now embroiled in a non-related civil suit. File photo

Janice Morse reports:

A federal court jury is about to begin deliberating in the case of Warren County residents who accuse police of unlawfully raiding an adult birthday party, falsely arresting two partygoers and maliciously prosecuting them.

As of 1:30 p.m., Judge Susan J. Dlott was still providing jurors with detailed instructions as to how to decide the case under both state and federal laws. The trial began Monday in U.S. District Court, Cincinnati, over a party that happened four and a half years ago.

In their civil lawsuit, Hamilton Township residents Ted and Mary Pritchard and two young men who attended their 2007 party — Kevin Clark and Zach Christman — allege police conspired to raid the Pritchards’ party under false pretenses, then tried to cover-up their alleged wrongdoing. Judge Dlott has already ruled that Christman’s right against false arrest was violated under federal law, but the jury must decide whether his right against false arrest was violated under state law.

Wilson Weisenfelder, a lawyer defending Hamilton Township police, asked the jury to grant little or no monetary damages for Christman. Weisenfelder also argued that there was no evidence of a conspiracy or cover-up. He again repeated what he had told the jury in opening statements — that the case was about police trying to do their jobs.

Konrad Kircher, who represents the Pritchards, Clark and Christman, said that, for jurors to believe that, they would have to “ignore a mountain of contrary evidence.”

He said the Pritchards have a constitutional right to be free from unlawful intrusion of police on their premises — and that police concocted a scenario to try to justify going onto the Pritchards’ property. That included a bogus telephone report of loud noise coming from the property, which is located on an acre of land largely isolated from other homes, Kircher said.

A Hamilton Township officer’s wife, Gail Gilbert, who was then living in Butler County, miles away from the party location, called a dispatcher in Warren County and reported: “I hear a lot of yelling and screaming from the 10,000 block of Schlotmann (Road)…I’d rather remain anonymous…it sounds like a big-ol’ party or somethin’ goin’ on.”

Kircher told the jury that Mrs. Gilbert made the call after her husband’s supervisor, Lt. Phil Johnson, asked Officer Roger Gilbert to request the call be made. Kircher played a recording of call for the jury to hear and said, “I want you to ask yourselves: Is this a reluctant wallflower who doesn’t want to cooperate?” Kircher suggested Mrs. Gilbert was an enthusiastic participant in the alleged conspiracy, which could have helped advance her husband’s career if everything had gone as planned.

(more…)

no comments yet

Posted in: News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

TueJan24

Widmer detective denies conspiracy in birthday raid

Posted by rrichardson January 24th, 2012, 8:42 am Post a Comment
Jeff Braley

Jeff Braley, then the lead detective for Hamilton Township Police, testifies in the second murder trial of Ryan Widmer, of Mason. File photo

Janice Morse reports:

The former detective from the Ryan Widmer murder case testified for about a half hour Monday in an unrelated federal court civil-rights trial, denying allegations that he and other officers “conspired” to raid an adult birthday party under false pretenses.

“I didn’t put together anything, sir…I did not plan anything,” Jeff Braley, a former police lieutenant, said in response to a question from Konrad Kircher, a lawyer representing Ted and Mary Pritchard of Hamilton Township and two other people.

Kircher questioned Braley about events surrounding the 2007 incident on the Pritchards’ property.

Kircher did not ask Braley about his employment credentials as part of his testimony today, although Kircher was allowed to explore that topic in a pretrial deposition.

Braley has denied making false statements found in his employment records. He resigned last year after an investigation into those documents.

In the Pritchard case, the family and their partygoers allege that nearly two dozen officers stormed the property in 2007 based on unsupported suspicions of underage drinking, court records say. The party was being thrown for Ted Pritchard’s 52nd birthday and for the Pritchards’ son’s 21st birthday, Kircher said.

The Pritchard family later learned that the raid happened partly because a Hamilton Township officer’s wife called the Hamilton Township police department from her Butler County home, pretending to be calling from Warren County and reporting she heard loud noise coming from the Prtichards’ party, court records say.

Prospective jurors in the Pritchard case denied recognizing Braley from the highly publicized Widmer case, which ended with Widmer, now 31, who last lived in Mason, being convicted in the 2008 bathtub drowning of his wife. His case went to trial three times before he was convicted a year ago. Only two of the prospective jurors in the Pritchard case said they followed any phase of the Widmer case closely.

no comments yet

Posted in: Crime, News, Widmer Trial |

Tags: Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Connect with MasonBuzz

Subscribe

Get community news delivered straight to your inbox.

Featured Businesses

Reach the Audience That Matters Most to You!

We can deliver the highly targeted audience your business needs to attract new customers. Start building your ad now!

Send us Photos

  • Attach a JPEG (.jpg) photo to your story. Maximum file size is 4 MB.
  • Add a caption, include names & communities of people pictured. (Caption limit: 500 characters, including spaces)

Recent Photos

Mormon seminary graduation JDRF Walk to Cure Diabetes tennis Cammy & Marie Gones Madison Terry Claudia Sanders Rosie Menyhert Sam Siler Steven Soffel
View more photos >